RSS Feed

‘Blog’ Category

  1. Why ebooks will win

    December 19, 2010 by Mathew Ferguson

    From my extremely scientific sample size of one (me) I’ve drawn the very rigorous conclusion from a wealth of data: ebooks will win.

    When I say win I mean win the way cars won over horses. Win in a way that is complete and pervasive. Win the way lasers won over catapults. Win the way Ninjas won over My Little Pony.

    It is so incredibly easy to buy books on Kindle. Search, click, buy. Search, sample, buy. Buy a book, others also bought, browse, sample, buy.

    I think the term used is “frictionless”. I don’t have to enter credit card details with each purchase (thus giving me the chance to think it over). The book turns up in under 30 seconds.

    And it’s easy to use!

    I love my Kindle so very very much and while I love my book collection I look at it now as a big heavy problem. A problem involving beautiful things but a problem.

    The loss of the cheaper secondhand market isn’t good but I think piracy and ultra-low cost ebooks will take care of that. We also need to work out how to retool our libraries so citizens can have access to any book they want.

    Hooray for ebooks!


  2. The Utter Crushing Dominance of The Kindle (and ebook readers)

    October 30, 2010 by Mathew Ferguson

    I’ve had my Kindle 3 for about a month now and it was just last night in bed on day five of the flu that I accepted some facts about ebooks, the Kindle and other ebook readers (Kobo, etc).

    Sure, I’ve said for about a year now (and thought) that ebooks were going to eviscerate traditional publishing but being that I was still a paper edition buyer, the actual truth of this fact hadn’t connected on an emotional level. To put it bluntly, I was talking the talk but not walking the walk.

    Intellectually I’d thought through the mass distribution of cheap e-readers, the elimination of gatekeepers, the endless churning process which pushed good books to the top of the pile and the resulting effect on paper publishing but some part of me was still hanging on to the idea that paper publishers were pretty much going to exist in the same form they have today.

    Oh boy, was I wrong and here’s why.

    Last night I’m browsing the Kindle sci-fi range, searching for super heroes and time travel and just seeing what turns up when I stumble across Old Man’s War by John Scalzi. It was $6.99 and had close to five stars so I downloaded the sample. A few minutes later (maybe 10 to read the sample) I clicked buy and maybe thirty seconds later I’m reading the book.

    Old Man’s War is excellent: slick and fast and full of future tech.

    Buying Old Man’s War was also slick and fast and full of a present tech that feels futuristic.

    There was zero friction between desire to buy and buying. There was no slow download, there was no need to get out of bed! And once I finished the book I immediately bought The Ghost Brigades.

    The previous day (day four of the flu), I’d bought four or five titles. One was a superhero novella. Another was David Sedaris’ When You Are Engulfed in Flames. One was a strange police procedural/magic/sci-fi mixture that I can’t remember the name of right now.

    Of the various titles I’ve bought, only a few are from “name” authors. John Scalzi is well-known but outside of Kindle world B.V. Larson not so much (although with his sales he’s gaining notoriety). The author of the superhero novella is pretty much unknown. The weird police procedural is a rising star in ebook world but unknown everywhere else.

    So here’s the point: the good books rise to the top naturally and then people buy them and absolutely don’t care if they know the author’s name or not.

    What does this mean?

    Anyone with a good book can sell.

    So what does this mean (and get to the point dumbass)?

    Unknown authors without a publisher behind them (or in front of them, locking up rights for a billion years) are making money and not tiny dribbling bits of money but serious actual worthwhile money. They don’t need a marketing team, they don’t need salespeople, they don’t need a giant corner block office with high black windows and a huge sign out the front … all they need is their story (and maybe an editor).

    This is why paper publishing is utterly and irretrievably fucked. Paper publishing has nothing to offer. Money? Nope. Prestige? Nope. Editorial skill (easy to obtain elsewhere). Sales staff (for what? The natural churn will pull good books up). Marketing (turns out it’s not that hard and again, good books rise anyway).

    Right now, there are thousands of authors putting up work on Kindle and seeing what happens. Some are making sales and that’s enough for them to keep going. It takes very little to convince a writer to continue with Kindle publishing because the alternative (paper publishing) is zero dollars and zero sales.

    The Death of Paper Publishing Goes Like This

    Let’s meet three writers.

    Susan, a 31-year-old English teacher who writes exciting Sci-fi on the side. She’s had limited success in publishing, managing to get two stories published, one in a print magazine and the other online. She was only ever paid in contributions.

    Michael, a 28-year-old waiter who writes Fantasy and years ago made the choice to have a non-taxing low-paid day job that left him time to write. He’s had nothing published. He often thinks about attending law school and giving up on the idea of making a living from writing.

    Joe, a 39-year-old freelance writer who writes Thrillers. He’s written a lot of corporate stuff over the years, slipped in and out of full-time employment and has three complete unpublished novels plus hundreds of thousands of words of short stories, partial novels, poetry and everything else sitting around.

    Our three writers each decide to take a punt on Kindle publishing.

    Susan puts up Teeming, a sci-fi adventure where humankind finally makes it to the stars only to discover that every possible human suitable planet in the entire universe is already settled and well-armed.

    Michael puts up 100 Hours, a fantasy action adventure where the lead character is brought back from the dead for just 100 hours in order to have his revenge and set things right.

    Joe puts up Blistered, Charred, and Scarred, his three thriller titles featuring a wealthy police officer trying to do good while a devious killer mastermind slips ever deeper into dark acts.

    They each join the various Kindle communities and write blog posts about putting their work up. Only Joe, the freelance writer thinks about some sort of advertising but he decides to wait and see.

    Within a week, Susan has made 10 sales for $2.99 each. She has earned herself $2.10 per titles – a whopping $21! Michael isn’t going so well and he’s only sold one copy. Joe is kicking ass and taking names and has sold twenty copies of each title – around 60 sales, each netting him $2.10 per sale. With $126 collected for his first week, Joe is ecstatic!

    Skip forward a month and Joe and Susan are complete converts to e-publishing. Susan’s Teeming picked up a few good reviews and climbed high enough in the rankings that other people started trying it out. She got a big push in particular from the Amazon algorithm putting her title in the “Other People Also Bought” section of some of the best-selling Sci-fi.

    Joe has gone from strength to strength with his weekly royalties rarely dropping below $100. He crossed the $500 mark and was delighted to get a check in the mail.

    Michael hasn’t quite had the same success but his 100 Hours is chugging along, selling a few copies here and there. By the end of the month he’s sold 20 books and after reading a lot of forums online he has become convinced that if he writes more books, he’ll have more sales.

    Skip forward six months.

    Susan now has two titles up and is working on a third. She can’t retire from teaching to write full-time but the extra money she’s earning keeps her motivated and writing on the weekends.

    Joe has transformed into the type of writing machine he becomes when he’s on deadline with a contract hanging over him. He’s put up another thriller title and compiled the best of his unpublished work into two more books: one of poetry, the other of short stories. He’s heading to $2000 in royalties for this month and as his earnings have risen, he’s dropped away freelance work to focus on ebook writing.

    Michael has a second title up and has seen a definite bump in his sales. He’s now selling at least five books a day and even though that’s not much, the $300 a month is definitely coming in handy. Most importantly, he’s receiving positive feedback on his work – both in terms of good reviews and money in his pocket.

    None of these writers have bothered submitting a manuscript to a paper publisher since they began Kindle publishing.

    Meanwhile …

    Things at The Trad Pub Co (TPC) are not going so well. Sales are down as bookshops report a drop in sales. An industry report conducted by an independent researcher cuts to the heart of the matter: the heavy book buyers were also the first to buy Kindles and other ebook readers and now buy most of their books online. Only the moderate and infrequent purchasers remain and they simply don’t plunge the amount of cash into reading that the heavy buyers did. The unspoken industry knowledge comes out: without the heavy book buyers, bookshops simply cannot exist.

    Inside TPC there is a battle between traditional and ebook publishing. One of the editors (Lisa) who now owns a Kindle has been fighting to reduce the price of TPC’s ebooks to $2.99. She is losing the battle though as the upper management cannot bear the idea of selling an ebook for less than $12.99.

    Lisa is thinking of quitting, especially after the meeting today where she presented Joe’s work and requested permission to make him an offer to e-publish his other work. She wants to offer Joe 70% of the royalties, with the remaining 30% to go to the company to cover editing and cover design and to make some profit. Unfortunately, the upper management cannot accept the idea that the writer earns 70% and the company 30% – given that it has been 88% to company and 12% to writer for a very long time.

    They authorise Lisa to offer Joe 25% of the ebook royalties and a $2000 advance. With her stomach churning, she contacts Joe who is delighted to hear from her and even more delighted to turn her down. $2000? He just made that in a month. And why would he settle for 25%? He’s making $2.10 per title sold. The editor agrees with him. She cannot see any justification why he would take their offer.

    Skip forward a year…

    Oh boy, things at TPC are really going badly. As more and more people buy ebook readers, the online market swells. Actually it doesn’t swell – it explodes. There are thousands of good books available for low prices and almost all the heavy buyers now own an e-reader and don’t hit the bookshops anymore. Even the moderate purchasers are picking up e-readers and as the hardware cost drops, more people leave paper book buying behind.

    TPC has dropped their ebook prices to $8.99 and still cannot accept the idea that a book should cost less than $5.00. The company is hemorrhaging money as marketing, sales and distribution all continue to draw salaries (and upper management) but increasingly have less and less to do. The managing editor is slowly starting to see that Lisa (who quit six months ago to start her own ebook editing business) may have been right. In the last year TPC has made multiple advances to independent self-publishing authors but has been turned down time and time again. In one particularly stinging email, Michael, a fantasy author, wrote: “I’m making $800 a month publishing on my own. When I submitted my work to your company I was rejected. Why should I publish with TPC? I don’t see that your company has anything to offer me.”

    Out in ebook world, our three writers are moving along with various degrees of success. Joe has completely left freelance writing and for the first time in ten years is going to crack $50,000 in income for a single year. Susan’s sales are going strong – this year she’ll earn $20,000 in royalties and she and her husband have had some serious conversations about Susan quitting teaching to write full-time. Michael has just hit $1000 in royalties for a single month and it looks like within a year he’ll earn $12,000 in royalties. He’s still working his terrible waiter job but he’s got a plan: if he can earn more than $1500 a month in royalties, he’ll quit his job and focus on writing.

    Lisa, the editor who saw what was coming, is running a successful ebook editing business. Her prices are low for new customers and rise to moderate for returning customers. Every writer she talks to she tells to focus on e-publishing and forget paper publishing entirely.

    We skip forward …

    TPC collapsed and after the mass firings and clearing of deadwood the entire company is down to three editors, a graphic designer and a huge back catalogue of e-book rights still controlled by the company. Most of the upper management is gone, victims of a cutthroat cost rationalization. The three editors collectively borrowed money and bought out the company from the original owners (a private hedge fund who just wanted out). TPC has ceased traditional publishing entirely and is currently selling ebooks from $0.99 – $4.99. The three editors think that they can offer editorial services and some marketing in return for 30% of the total ebook royalty.

    Perhaps they’re right …

    As the great ship of traditional publishing slowly flounders and the stories of ebook publishing success flow out into the world, the final striking blow cuts in: new writers think of ebook publishing first. The freelance writers who were close to publication in the past put their manuscripts up for sale and have some success. The journalists take their unpublished work and sell it. The new writers put up their first efforts and have a few sales … just enough to convince them to continue.

    And nowhere in here do we see large traditional paper publishing being able to offer anything of value to these writers…



  3. Bye bye fake writers

    October 11, 2010 by Mathew Ferguson

    Thanks to the Kindle (and Smashwords, etc) there are no more gatekeepers between a writer and publication.

    No editor to convince.

    To brainless marketing team who need to be sold the sizzle.

    No accounting department who need to see the business case.

    There is just you, your work and the readers.

    The only barrier now is computer literacy. But if you can use Google you can very quickly learn how to correctly format your work and even how to create a book cover that doesn’t completely suck. I think most people can do this so I’ll go back to the main point: there are no more gatekeepers.

    You see, the gatekeepers used to be a legitimate excuse. You had a meeting with an editor but it didn’t quite get there and you don’t know why (there may not have been any real reason, by the way). You were offered a contract but turned it down (I did this). You signed a contract but then the publisher went out of business (this also was me). The marketing person didn’t like your work and they had influence and so you got a rejection letter and will never know how close to publication you really were.

    These were legitimate excuses. I’ve been close, time and time again and I know a few other writers who have had the same experience.

    Ah, but now but now …

    No more faking it. No more bullshit reasons why that novel isn’t published. No more “I’m looking for an agent”.

    If you can complete your work then you can publish it and see just how many people buy it for their Kindle (or whatever other e-reader they have).

    E-readers are still only a small part of the publishing market but even so, we’re not talking a few hundred sales per month – we’re talking tens of thousands of sales per month. If you put your work up and it doesn’t sell, well … it tells you something doesn’t it.

    It used to be easy for faux-writers to blend in and pretend to be real writers. You’d see them on forum sites spouting crap about not following the rules or some other idiotic anti-authoritarian garbage that is actually a long convoluted defense of their terrible work. And how could you tell them apart? They can lie about meetings with editors or claims about writing all the time. They’d blather on about how they must write, as though it is some curse rather than a choice (oh and how I fucking hate this crap. They look at you and shake their head, trying to pretend they are doomed to write and it is better for you to not have this burden. Hey, I must write too but I don’t go around being a dick about it.).

    But now but now …

    You can’t fake it. If you’ve finished a novel and edited it then you can publish and see what happens.

    There are no more excuses.


  4. Pay the Writer – Harlen Ellison

    May 28, 2010 by Mathew Ferguson

    I love this clip so very very much but … I also worked for free at the start of my writing career. I did it because when you’ve nothing but talent/ability and no credentials then you can’t compete with professional writers. Of course I fucking worked for free! Was I happy to? Fuck yes! (Sorry, channeling Ellison a little.)

    He’s dead right about amateurs working for free making it hard for professionals. Even after five years and a massive project list I was having big rich companies trying to get me to work for free. Because it will be good “experience” or good on my project list.

    I’ve been the undercutting newbie and I’ve been the undercut professional so I feel the pain here. Yes, it pissed me off that a client decided to compare my $2000 quote with some chump off ifreelance who offered to do it for $200 but hey, that’s the free market.

    And samples … man, like Ellison I want to say motherfucker we signed a contract! I have ONE MILLION activity books on British Airways. Have I ever seen a copy of my work in real life? Fuck no! I can’t get ONE fucking copy?

    Alright, enough channeling.

    I say work for free at the start and then work for money later. Don’t worry about what it does to other established writers.


  5. Single serving Watermelon

    April 18, 2010 by Mathew Ferguson

    … not quite this small.

    So my wild vegetable garden has produced quite a few pumpkins, 90 or so red chillies, two rockmelon (which the birds ate) and four delicious hand-sized watermelon.

    These watermelon fit comfortably into the palm and when cut in half make a spectacular bowl of sweetness.

    It is so much superior to buying the giant watermelon chunks or whole watermelons at the supermarket.

    What is one of the problems of eating watermelon? Dripping juice! But with watermelon in it’s own natural bowl, it’s no-drip no-mess.

    I suspect if this size watermelon were commercialised, the clever watermelon producer would start making money hand over non-watermelon-juice-soaked fist!


  6. There ain't no "Junior"

    March 26, 2010 by Mathew Ferguson

    A question for you: what is the difference between a copywriter and a junior copywriter?

    Answer: the money.

    Not the work.

    I keep an eye on the job market and so many times I see Junior Copywriter or Copywriter (Graduate) being advertised. Then I read the job description and it is a standard Copywriter position. They just want to pay $15000 less per year.

    I saw this same thing in a publishing company where I worked many years ago. They needed a graphic designer. So they appended “Junior” to the front of the job, cut $15K from the salary and the guy they hired was doing the standard graphic design job within a few weeks.

    What happened as a result of this? Well, eventually he worked out there was no difference between his job and the graphic designer job. He then worked out that the pittance he was receiving wasn’t fair. He asked for a pay raise. He was denied.

    He quit.

    Ah, but the company had this guy for long enough that the savings looked good so they did the same thing. They simply would. not. pay.

    We didn’t get applications from professional graphic designers who kicked ass. We got applications from graduates of uncertain quality. I have no problem with graduates – everyone has to start somewhere – but even these guys work it out and then quit. And as for their productivity? It’s lower, generally. What about experience? That knowledge that only comes from making mistakes and seeing things happen? It’s gone.

    One mistake cost us $12,000. No one picked it up and there was no way they could – it was only the kind of thing that experience can alert you to.

    But there is a far worse result of creating these faux-junior positions: the company starts expecting high quality work for peanuts.

    Pretty soon an experienced graphic designer who is worth $60K at least is looking drastically overpaid. Why pay that when for $30K you can get a junior? So when the next high paid graphic designer quits for whatever reason, they replace them with a junior. Hey, we’re now saving $30K! What a great idea!

    Slowly the experience leaks away and because of this focus on wages, the experienced designers/copywriters/whatever can’t get pay raises.

    There are some jobs where it is simply about filling seats with warm bodies. Jobs where junior is a correct description and when they start doing other work, they lose the junior and make more money. But when Junior means nothing but lower wages it’s a mug’s game. A bad circle that in the end results in the destruction of your business.


  7. How to write like Seth Godin

    March 4, 2010 by Mathew Ferguson

    How to write like Seth Godin

    1)      Tell some folksy anecdote or recollect something about the day

    2)      Ask a generic question about customers, staff, marketing, etc

    3)      Close it up with the point of what you were saying but still be a bit vague about it all

    Let’s take this post: Mowing the Lawn

    SethGodinWritingStructure

     

     

    Now to follow the formula:

    Scaring the cows

    I used to scare cows.

    Growing up on a farm meant that I had to spend my time moving cows from one paddock to the next so they’d eat down the grass. The paddocks were surrounded with barbed wire that the cows quickly learned to keep away from and there were gates connecting the paddocks. One gate was small and when I opened it, the cows would keep back until I walked further away. Then they’d trot through. One gate was enormous and the cows would happily walk through with me standing at the end of it.

    Sometimes I had to scare the cows to push them through a gate and they’d run.

    I wonder how your customers feel?

    Does it show?

    If you are too close to your customers as they move around your business then they’ll shy away or bolt through and disappear. Open up the gates they move through and look for any areas that are particularly spiky and painful for them to encounter. Directing customers is a good thing – making them panicked or using spiky deterrents like high fees, small print and the like is bad.

    Anecdotes are not Evidence

    I’ve been entertained and educated and informed by Seth Godin for a while now and I often agree with what he is saying but lately I’ve been getting the feeling he’s phoning it in with this-by-the numbers structure. His style of writing has the ring of truth about it, the feeling of being true but it’s mostly anecdotal.

    Applying Science to Godin

    How about attempting to transform his blog posts into testable hypotheses? For the Mowing the Lawn post I think the main point is: Customer service people get a lot of useful information directly from customers about your product/service and it doesn’t go to marketing, sales, product design or other jobs that influence customers directly therefore if you want that information, these groups need to do the customer service job.

    This suggests to me the following areas to investigate:

    1)      Customer service suck at passing on information or are prevented in doing so

    2)      Customer service are good as passing on information but it is ignored

    3)      Nothing can replace direct exposure to customers so if you want good results you need direct exposure.

    To go a bit deeper into it, I think this post is really suggesting that direct exposure to customers can’t be replaced by any other method. So there is our experiment: testing direct exposure vs. other methods.

    Experiment:

    Divide marketing, sales, product design into three groups who will in one week present suggestions for improvements to product/service/system.

    Group #1 will not talk to customer service or customers but will only talk amongst themselves and come up with ideas.

    Group #2 will talk to customer service and ask questions but cannot have direct customer contact.

    Group #3 will have direct customer contact but will not talk to customer service.

    My prediction?

    Group #1 will come up with cosmetic changes to the product/service/system.

    Group #2 will have some very specific solutions, some of which will be based around making your staff happier, rather than your customers happier. Some of the suggestions will do both.

    Group #3 will have some specific solutions but because of their short exposure time to customers will have less useful answers than group #2.

    Analysis

    Where I think Godin falls down in his original post is that it doesn’t take into account the sample of customers that the marketing, sales, product designers, etc would be encountering. I think there would be a significant bias toward annoyed/angry/frustrated customers calling customer service. If you’re a Telco with tens of thousands of customers then if might be perfectly fine to receive 150 annoyed/angry/frustrated customer calls per day. If you’ve only got one hundred customers than clearly even one or two a month is unacceptable.

    So if you follow Godin’s advice and get your marketing people talking to angry customers will they forget that you’ve got 98% satisfied customers and 2% unsatisfied customers? Will they blow the problems out of proportion and alter your service so suddenly you annoy 30% of your customers?

    Contradictory messages

    If you read Godin long enough you’ll start to notice that some of his advice appears to contradict other bits of advice.

    See this post “The Customer is Always Right

    It talks about firing the 1% of customers who cause 95% of the pain. Focus on those who you can keep happy. If I mesh this post with Mowing the Lawn I get a clear instruction for everyone to have direct contact with customers presumably to make changes to product/service … but fire customers who complain too much or with whom your business is always in the wrong.

    What should you do? Listen to those customers or get rid of them?

    How about “Treating different customers differently

    Sprint will cancel your service if you call customers service too much to complain. Message: get rid of complaining customers and spend your time focussing on the ones you can keep happy.

    By suggesting sales, marketing, product design get on the phones with customers, it seems Godin is saying that changes should be made in your service/product/system based on the direct contact with these customers. But what about ignoring them or firing them? Where does that fit in?

    The Guru is never wrong

    Some wise person says some vague things and all the novices nod and smile and then head off to action. The Guru has spoken so vaguely that if it doesn’t work then you must have misunderstood it and if it does work, well, that’s why they are the Guru and you’re the novice.

    Godin as Guru

    One of the good things about being a Guru is that you don’t have to provide evidence for what you say. You trade on experience or status in one area which allows you to make statements in that area and others. A quick examination of Godin’s posts finds some statements that could do with some evidence:

    “In most endeavours, a small increase in risk can double the reward. It’s the second doubling of reward that brings serious risk with it. But the first leap is relatively painless.”

    Um … evidence? How would you test that a small increase in risk can double reward? How would you test that a subsequent doubling brings serious risk with it?

    “There is always a gap between the short-term results of a well-polished system and the first results of a switch to a more efficient one.”

    Evidence? How would you test this?

    “The best marketing strategy is to destroy your industry before your competition does.”

    How the f*ck do you test this? You’re selling software everyone wants so you’re making a giant pile of money. There are some free software people edging into your area. Some time in the future they may destroy your industry by offering excellent software for free. So … Godin says … destroy your current business before you are destroyed. Hmm. How about … they won’t destroy your industry for five years so make money while the sun shines? How about work on making such an amazing paid product that no one will use the free product?

    “Big marketing breakthroughs always come from doing something that everyone else says is off the table.”

    So I should hire a team of tattooists to kidnap kids and tattoo my competitor’s brands across their foreheads before letting them go? How would you test Godin’s claim? What evidence would you gather to test that breakthrough can come from following quite standard processes?

    The Answer to Gurus

    Try to transform what they say into a testable hypothesis. Imagine trying to build an experiment to actually test out their ideas and get hard data. In doing this you’ll see through the shallow and may be able to extract the good, if there is some of it there.

    And finally …

    This post is a bit harsh on Godin but as I said before I have been educated, informed and entertained by him and I generally think he’s doing a pretty good job. He’s prodding people to think which is very good. As for all those tools I run into on Twitter who style themselves as Gurus … fuck off. Just fuck off now please. Your ham-fisted attempts to copy Godin are so utterly stupid and you should quit.

    (Oh yeah, I realise that Godin actually has a few formats for his posts but this is the one I decided to pick on because it is the one I see most copied. Ah, but is it? Evidence anyone?)


  8. Super Monkey Group eBook torrent

    February 14, 2010 by Mathew Ferguson



    http://www.mininova.org/tor/2435989

    Super Monkey Group has been downloaded 921 times via this torrent. Torrents rock!


  9. A new idea for movies

    February 10, 2010 by Mathew Ferguson

    Step 1)

    Write a script where key scenes can play out in three different ways. We have the happy version, the sad version and the dark version.

    Step 2)

    Film the movie, performing all variations of these key scenes.

    Step 3)

    Cut the movie together so you now have three versions.

    Step 4)

    Distribute the film to cinemas so some get the happy version, some get the sad and some get the dark. Keep it all secret.

    Step 5)

    Sit back and watch the delightful confusion.

    Imagine you watched Matrix Revolutions on the weekend and you’re at work talking about it. Your film is about 85% the same as the film your co-workers watched at different cinemas.

    “Man, I can’t believe how dark that ending was! Smith takes over the machine world and destroys everything and then there is only that tiny band of humans and those few robots left to rebuild everthing.”

    “What? That’s not what happened. He saved everyone and he and Trinity were heroes.”

    “But Trinity died and yeah he saved everyone but he died too.”

    !

    All the movie reviews would be different! Some would be praising the dark endings, some the happy endings. No one would know what was going on until people started to piece it together. Then the film would enjoy a resurgance of ticket sales as they go back to see the dark version or the happy version.

    It would be an interesting split test too. Imagine the dark version gets way more ticket sales from the referring friends – then does that mean it was better?

    The DVD would need all the key scenes on it and a way to select which version you wanted to watch.

    The trick would be to write the scenes in such a way that the varied scenes appear throughout the film rather than only at the end.

    What do people think?


  10. Call me Reverend Mat

    January 29, 2010 by Mathew Ferguson

    I don't have to be part of the underground marriage circuit any longer.

    I don't have to be part of the underground marriage circuit any longer.

    Google “ordained minister” and get ordained as a minister within minutes.