Archive | Editing tips RSS for this section

Is the New

Is it time to retire “X is the new Y” yet? Editor Mattie says: Yes! It has gone past cliche. The only way it can be used is self-referentially (Black is the new Black!) or in comedy ala Josie and the Pussy Cats (OMG Orange is the new Pink!)

Otherwise, cut cut cut.  Remember kids, editing is the new sandwich. Or something like that.

First ten pages of Google:

Pink is the new Blog

Small is the new Big

Fake is the new Real

Vegetarian is the new Prius

Blood is the new Black

Green is the new Red

Blue is the new Green

Facebook is the new AOL

Republican is the new Punk

Euro is the new Dollar

Water is the new Oil

Trillion is the new Billion

The Blog is the new Resume

Bitch is the new Black

Square is the new Round

Class is the new Black

The Location Field is the new Command Line

Unqualified is the new Qualified

Yellow is the new Black

Brown is the new Green

Self-publishing is the new Real Publishing

Solis is the new Daschle

Sex without Condoms is the new Engagement Ring

Sketching is the new Black

Fugly is the new Pretty

Big is the new Small

Flat is the new Up

Dead is the new 90

Mobile is the new Desktop

Privacy is the new Black

Gay is the new Black

Limbaugh is the new Bush

Pace is the new Peril

Geeky is the new Cool

Old is the new New

Self-publishing is the new Blogging

Customer Service is the new Marketing

Home decor is the new fashion

Hyperconnectivity is the new Reality

Green is the new Blah

Fringe is the new Lost

Michelle O is the new Jackie O

Food is the new Sex

The Web is the new Hollywood

The Truth is the new Lie

Uncertainty is the new Normal

Yellow is the new Pink

Fat is the new Black

Frugal is the new Black

Lifestyle search is the new Black

Cash is the new Black

Vietnam is the new China

David Price is the new Joba Chamberlain

Awake is the new Sleep

Less is the new More

Pussy is the new Black

Zombie Dog is the new Spaghetti Cat

image source: http://webdelsol.com/DIAGRAM/6_3/leisurearts.html

Rediscovering your writing (and a bit on the creative process)

While looking through short stories to post up here I came across some stories I hadn’t looked at for a loooooong time. In one case it was at least two years.

I found an incomplete story that was clearly under construction. There was even a note in there saying *man I’m tired zzzzz* in the middle of text. If this story were a physical thing it would be a few pieces of wood held together with tape and various partially constructed bits lying around it. At a glance you can see what it is meant to be but you can’t quite see how it’s going to come together. There are too many leftover parts and random bits of wood and metal piled up.

Anyways, I had completely forgotten that I had written this story. As I read through it was like reading it for the first time. This could have something to do with how very tired I apparently was when I wrote it. The time between then and now is clearly a factor.

I laughed a true and honest chortle at one of the sentences.

Wow.

Sometimes I laugh when I’m writing – often because whatever the writing bit says to me is unexpected and I’m the first person hearing the joke. This makes me sound like a mad person but it’s probably the best way to describe the creative process. For me it is this: I hear me who is the one writing this post. This is the one the world meets. Then there is the other me which is the writing part. That voice, for lack of a better term, is a chattering idea-producing dynamo. When I reach into the dark it is the one with the words waiting. And always with the freaking ideas, all the time, even when I’m trying to sleep, which can be really annoying. Then there is the other me who is also an idea generator and has debates with the idea dynamo. It’s like two characters who are madly enthusiastic and build on what the other has to say.

“Wow! That’s great! What if we add x, y, z and then a, b, c and how COOL would that be?”

“Then we can twist this part and then we can connect it to that other-”

“Yeah! And after we twist that we can tie this other bit around to-”

And on it goes as I sit there listening to all this and sometimes contributing my own bit to the process.

There is another part as well – a slower deep thinker who listens to it all and ties deeper structures together. This is the part that speaks up when I’m in the shower and it says “Hey Mat – you know that bit of the story you’ve been stuck on for six months? How about this?”

Then out will come some amazing package that has clearly been worked on for a while and it is divinely beautiful.

Let your stories rest

To improve your writing you need to give it time to rest. Time for you to forget all about it while that deeper part works way in silence. Long novels in particular need time for you to step back and consider the structures you’ve built. To go back to the building simile, you’ve hammered together a magnificent towering marvel of words but you need to leave it for six months to see which parts fall down because they were only held together with tape in the first place.

Forgetting your writing allows you to see with a critical eye the weak parts that need to be cut or strengthened.

A little more on writing and the creative process

Imagine you watch a football match. There are players running around, the ball is flying around the place, all kinds of crazy patterns and plays are occurring and there you are in the stands writing it all down. Now if someone gets their nose broken in a burst of blood and violence it would be ridiculous for anyone to say to you “why did you do that? Why did you break his nose?” Your answer would be “I didn’t break his nose! Another player broke it. I was simply recording what happened.”

This is how some of the best writing happens. The characters have a life and spirit of their own and you are writing down their actions. If you attempt to force them to do something against their nature then they will refuse to move.

Now imagine a stage show where you are playing all the characters. You put on the “Dad” costume and come out on the stage under the searing lights and clumsily read out Dad’s lines. Then you go offstage, change into the “Mum” costume and come back out on stage again. You read out Mum’s lines. Then you change into the dog costume. Then the policeman costume. Soon you are hot and sweaty and hating every labourious moment out there. The whole process is hard and there is no flow and you start thinking about killing every character right then and there.

This is how some really terrible writing happens. The characters don’t have a life and spirit. It’s just you, attempting to shove and pull and animate the cast but you can never ever know what they would say or do in response to anything because they are dead puppets.

You’ll hit these hard bits sometimes. Yes, you should power through because in many ways it can be like a rehearsal for better work. During the writing some of the characters may start to come to life and you don’t need to jump into their costume. There may still be some empty costumes out there but as the cast come to life they may too.

Lesson: let stuff rest (for a looooong time if you can).

Lesson: take yourself out of pushing and pulling and animating. Let the characters come to life and simply observe them.

Lesson: (although not in article) – good writing is closely connected to blood sugar level and sleep. Rest well and remember to eat at regular times! No athlete would exercise with no food that day – no writer should attempt to write whilst hungry or low in blood sugar.

Would have versus Would of

Would of is wrong wrong wrong. But many people use it so it is right right right.

Would have is right and so is would of. Would of is correct by common usage.

So many editors and writers forget that language is a living thing. Whatever way people use language is ultimately correct. If we all started saying “me hungry” rather than “I’m hungry” then me hungry would be correct.

I remember many arguments … err … passionate discussions with other editors regarding commas. I’m in the commas are upturned chairs on the path to comprehension group and so I edit accordingly.

For example,
I found, to my surprise, that he had turned blue.

Edit:
I found to my surprise that he had turned blue.

Oh no! Suddenly people can’t understand it! Pfft.

Another edit:
I found to my surprise he’d turned blue.

And another:
To my surprise he’d turned blue.

Anyways, the point is that grammar is very useful and we should follow some rules but not at the expense of the living language.

Adverb crimes

Last night reading “The God Delusion” and the author used the word pairing “brutally raped”. The word rape is a verb – an action. The word brutally is an adverb – it describes a quality of the verb … and therein begin the crimes of the adverb.

Is there another way to be raped? What is the difference between brutally raped and raped? Is it possible to be gently raped?

By adding a quality to the verb we open up all kinds of absurd ideas like the one above. Unfortunately we do have degrees of rape and it all comes down to the details, as the law shows us by enforcing different sentences based on how the rape was conducted.

Some verbs have many adverbs that pair with them. For example, drink. You can drink slow, fast, quietly, loudly, boorishly and so on. In each case here there is a better word to replace each of these word pairing terms. You might use sip, gulp and quaff for example.

But for a word pairing like brutally raped there isn’t a replacement word. Could you use violated? No, because it doesn’t mean the same thing.

Common words often have a variety of replacement words to replace awkward word pairings. Run, bolt, skitter, trot, jog, gallop, dawdle -> all replacement words for walked quickly, walked slowly, etc.

So what is wrong with the word pairing brutally raped? The problem is when it is overused then people switch off when they read it. People have an automatic system that greys out the colour and vitality of words pairings heard or read too many times.

Words have an incredible power to shape our perceptions and our actions. Could you imagine if instead of twenty-seven civilian casualties the newsreader said twenty-seven innocent people were brutally murdered by the US military today. By consistently pairing brutally with raped, writers are trying to add an extreme edge to an already extreme action. Rather than increasing the power and shock of that word it, in fact, dilutes any power it has.

(And the side note: is there a way to be murdered that isn’t brutal? Yes, there is.)

A senseless bashing. Is there a bashing that makes sense? Mindless rage. Is there rage that is mindful?

Adverbs do have their place in writing. Walked slowly is different to dawdled. Dawdled carries tones of procrastination and deliberate delay. Walked slowly is free of those tones. For example, if someone just heard a loved one had died you could write “He walked slowly across the grass and sat down on the blue chair” but perhaps not “He dawdled across the grass and sat down on the blue chair”.

Most adverbs can be identified by their -ly ending. Quickly, quietly, stupidly, moronically, retardedly, slowly, etc.

But the best way to identify them is to first work out which word is the verb. It is the action of the sentence. There could be more than one of them. Then look for the word that answers the question “How or in which way is [verb] happening?” Once you’ve identified the word pairing, try to see if you can replace it with a single word.

“They quickly bounced from one side of the room to the other.”

Verb: bounced.

How or in what way is [bounced] happening?

Quickly.

Replacements? How about careened? Does it mean the same as quickly bounced? Is bounced strong enough by itself that quickly could be removed from the sentence?

“They bounced from one side of the room to the other.”
“They quickly bounced from one side of the room to the other.”
“They bounced around the room.”
“They bounced around the room, smashing furniture, kicking walls, splashing paint; it was a destructathon of epic scale.”
“They bounced around the room, kids possessed with the spirit of rubber balls.”

Anyways, one of the ways to make your writing better is to find adverbs and see if you can eliminate them.